augustf’s avataraugustf’s Twitter Archive—№ 58,655

  1. I assume this is to embarrass the super-Congress operating at the Supreme Court, so that they end up ruling that the same legal tactic is allowed to their supporters, but not to those who aren’t supporters/donors. To be clear, this too is anti-Constitutional nonsense. @emily_hoeven/1550480803498340353
    On twitter.com Twitter logo augustf’s avatar Mood +4 🙂